Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ekaterina Makarova (1996) vs Shakhzoda Asimova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our (1996) vs Asimova analysis and find out who is favored!
Ekaterina Makarova (1996) vs Shakhzoda Asimova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: (1996) 1 - 0 Asimova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), (1996) has won 42.83% of points on their second serve, while Asimova has won 26.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show (1996), in recent form, has won 55.28% of their opponent's second serve points, while Asimova has won 41.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.67% and 31.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: (1996) has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Asimova has saved 33.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year (1996) has won 55.17% of matches played (W/L 48/ 39), with Asimova winning 18.18% (W/L 2/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: (1996) has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 54/ 34), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Asimova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, (1996) has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.58% of matches (W/L 38/ 28), where as Asimova has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 18.18% of matches (W/L 2/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with (1996) winning 1 times and Asimova being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with (1996) winning 2 and Asimova winning 0. The last match between (1996) and Asimova was at the Shymkent, 14-04-2018, Q1 round, Clay with Ekaterina Makarova (1996) getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: (1996) and Asimova have played a deciding set 0 times, with (1996) winning 0 times and Asimova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with (1996) winning 0, and Asimova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, (1996) has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.24 while Asimova has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, (1996) has won 72% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Asimova has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, (1996) has converted 53.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Asimova has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
181
Rank
158
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
57% (218-166)
Career Total W/L
20% (4-16)
39% (13-20)
YTD W/L
20% (1-4)
$15,301
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ekaterina Makarova (1996) vs Shakhzoda Asimova For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For (1996) VS Asimova
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Ekaterina Makarova (1996) | Shakhzoda Asimova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ekaterina Makarova (1996) | Shakhzoda Asimova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 39% (13/20) | 20% (1/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 39% (30/47) | 27% (3/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (303/368) | 39% (36/57) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 48% (11/12) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 143 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:46 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 287.76 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1464/2271) | 39% (12/31) |
| 1st Serve W% | 52% (758/1464) | 17% (2/12) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (340/807) | 26% (5/19) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (151/286) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1021/2140) | 34% (16/47) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (8/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (4/1) | 20% (1/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (13/32) | 20% (1/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (24/6) | 0% (3/0) |
Ekaterina Makarova (1996) Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Sara Bejlek
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
114)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
56
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Julia Avdeeva
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
32%
(
11 of
34)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Amarissa Kiara Toth
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
1
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
55%
(
53 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
52 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
46%
(
26 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Shakhzoda Asimova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasiia Sergienko
Player
Shakhzoda Asimova
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
39%
(
12 of
31)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizaveta Gurianova
Player
Shakhzoda Asimova
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
10
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
view more
(1996) Vs Asimova Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of (1996) are available here and Asimova photos here.
-Shakhzoda-Asimova-h2h-profile.webp "(1996) Asimova H2h Summary Stats 16th June 2024")
-Shakhzoda-Asimova-h2h-stats.webp "Ekaterina Makarova (1996) Shakhzoda Asimova Prediction Stats")
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
